Introduction to Creation
Physics
By: Miles Pelton,
Feb. 2014
Rational
reasoning drives the conclusion that the fundamentals of physics are inherent
in the processes involved in the creation of what is known as the Universe
where nothing previously existed. Based
on evidence that matter now existing is made of quantum energy particles,
rational reasoning also drives the conclusion that a source exists from which came the energy to make and sustain all
things. On that basis rational reasoning concludes that all knowledge is
inherent in and has been learned through observation and study of the processes
involved in the creation and the behavior of that which exists.
The
understanding set out by this effort grew from consideration of the results of
the observations and conclusions conducted and recorded when approached from a
different perspective than has been applied in the development of current
beliefs. Current beliefs relating to the processes of creation were developed
from the perspective that the energy involved in the creation and sustenance of
creation is inherent in the matter that was created but without an explanation
for how the matter and inherent energy came to exist. Rational reasoning
concludes that a source of energy is a prerequisite to the formation of matter
and the energy inherent in matter. With consideration for evidence that matter
is assembled quantum particles of energy, rational reasoning concludes that the
quantum particles of energy must have existed before there was matter. In the vernacular of rational reasoning, a
case of putting the horse before the cart. Therefore, that conclusion sets the
perspective for the conclusions drawn in reconsideration of the results of
recorded observations and study as expressed herein.
Rational
reasoning concludes that to achieve order in creating matter the elementary
energy particles would need to be absolutely identical in all aspects with
precise behavior characteristics capable of producing self-assemble leading to
the formation of the various materials capable of achieving variation in
creation. Those requisites left only one possibility. Each particle would need
to attract other particles but each particle would need to oppose the
attraction of other particles so as to create a physical presence. So each
elementary particle would need to possess the ability to attract and repel each
other but in order to assemble attracting and repelling energy charges in a
single particle a third form of energy would be needed. The third form of
energy would need to bond the attracting and repelling energy charges to form a
composite particle. With that combination of force producing charges, the
composite elementary particles would self-assemble.
Recognizing
that the attracting energy component inherent in elementary particles creates in
each assembly, a center of gravity that radiates from that point to establish
an energy field led to the realization that the intensity of the energy field
established by each center of gravity decreases as the distance from the source
increases. That results in a reduction in force produced by a center of gravity
inversely proportional to the distance over which acting, squared. As it turns
out, it is that behavior phenomena that regulates how the assembly of matter is
controled and that is the fundamental intelligence that is inherent in the
concept of elementary particle creation.
Given those
parameters, rational reasoning concludes that to achieve success in creating
matter the charges producing the forces to attract, repel and bond must be
sustained. Since the universe encompasses an enormous area, the means of
distributing without delay the energy to sustain the charge on elementary
particles would be needed. Considering the current belief that matter was
distributed throughout the universe by a “big bang” from the perspective of
elementary particles drives consideration for an alternative theory. Consider,
as recognized with the “big bang” theory that, if all of the energy charges
fundamental to making elementary particles existed as a singularity, the
instant they were given power they would expand and spread ubiquitously
throughout the universe in response to their interacting forces. Then consider
that the Cosmic Background Radiation that is spread ubiquitously throughout the
universe and thought to be heat residue of the “big bang” is instead the charge
that sustains the power of elementary particles.
Rational
reasoning is not unlike the processes applied by early Physicists such as
Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Einstein and many others and called a priori
reasoning. This effort is not intended as “scientific proof” but rather to
offer an explanation for observation and conclusions regarding fundamental
phyics from a different perspective. Concepts applied in attempting to
understand and explain the processes of creation have no effect on the
processes of creation. Concepts effect what is believed and therefore understanding
of the creation processes and that impacts the effectiveness of the knowledge
gained through the attempt to understand. From that regard, the
anti-fundamental physics mindset of the current community of physicists is counter-productive
to gaining understanding of the processes involved in the physics of creation.
No comments:
Post a Comment