By; Miles Pelton, May 2014
The
purpose of this critique is to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the science
community when it comes to providing empirical proof of the theories they
present as proven science.
The following is an extract of
Wikipedia’s article on Cosmic Background Radiation.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with cosmic microwave background
radiation or cosmic infrared background
radiation.
Cosmic background radiation is electromagnetic radiation from the sky
with no discernible source. The origin of this radiation depends on the region
of the spectrum that is observed. One component
is the cosmic microwave background
radiation.
The following is a blog given as reference by Wikipedia on their
explanation of Cosmic Background Radiation. This blog sums up the thinking of
scientists on the matter of the Big Bang.
If we go
back in time, getting closer to the big bang, more and more of our familiar
ideas about the universe are lost. No galaxies, no stars, and even more closer
to the big bang no atoms, no atomic nuclei, electrons, quarks, and not even any
elementary particles. Only energy, incredibly high temperature and pressure, is
left in the first second after the Big Bang. From this extremely hot ball of
energy, the entire universe originated. Eventually Physicists think they can
explain what happened, although the time of the big bang it, to date, remains a
mystery. Scared in the first seconds after the Big Bang.
The
following is an excerpt from an article published by the University of Chicago.
Nov 1,
2004
Erik M. Leitch of the University of Chicago explains.
The Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, or CMB for
short, is a faint glow of light that fills the universe, falling on Earth from
every direction with nearly uniform intensity. It is the residual heat of
creation--the afterglow of the big bang--streaming through space these last 14
billion years like the heat from a sun-warmed rock, reradiated at night.
The CMB is the oldest light we can see--the farthest back
both in time and space that we can look. This light set out on its journey more
than 14 billion years ago, long before the Earth or even our galaxy existed. It
is a relic of the universe's infancy, a time when it was not the cold dark
place it is now, but was instead a firestorm of radiation and elementary
particles. The familiar objects that surround us today--stars, planets,
galaxies and the like--eventually coalesced from these particles as the
universe expanded and cooled.
The
following are extracts from an article published by NASA.
The crux of the theory advanced as “the big bang” is
wrapped up in these two sentences. “No galaxies, no stars and even more closer
to the big bang no atoms, no atomic nuclei, electrons, quarks, and not even any
elementary particles. Only energy, incredibly high temperature and pressure, is
left in the first second after the big bang.”
Discussion:
Point one: Wikipedia goes to great length to point
out that there is a distinction between Cosmic Background Radiation and Cosmic
Microwave Radiation, a point that is almost instantly ignored concentrating on
justifying the big bang theory. All indication is that Cosmic Background Radiation
is a pre-existed the big bang. If so, it could be the source of the energy that
powered the creation event. The source that established and sustains the charge
on elementary particles that would have precipitated the big bang.
Point Two: No explanation is offered to establish
the nature or source of the energy that precipitated the big bang. The cause of
the big bang, the source for the energy that produced the intense temperature
and pressure, must be explained otherwise the theory is not proven.
Point Three: All of the articles have trouble defining
whether the residue of the big bang is heat, light or microwave radiation.
Accompanying literature explains that Cosmic Background Radiation was detected
as electro-magnetic (radio) radiation. Since neither heat nor light are
electro-magnetic radiation it is questioned how it was concluded that Cosmic Background
Radiation is heat or light.
Point four: A conclusion was drawn without quantitative
measurement that the big bang released extreme heat and pressure which is in
the face of an argument that expansion of space could have resulted from
non-heat producing processes. All reasoning and evidence supports a conclusion
that there was no pressure and absolute zero temperature at the time of the big
bang.
Point five: The articles go to great lengths trying
to explain how the radiation of light proves the processes theorized as
involved in the expansion of the universe. A question comes to mind;
recognizing that light radiates radially from its point of origin at the speed
of light, how can light from the first stars created be only now reaching us
since that light would be long gone?
Point six: There are other disturbing ambiguities dealing with current explanation
of light. Since the light of current explanation radiates as photons that phenomenon
drives two questions. One: with radiating photons decreasing in density
inversely as the distance squared it is doubtful that any discernable quantity
of photons from such distances could be detected, especially to provide
meaningful data since photons do not interact with electro-magnetic radiation. Two: with photons radiating from their source
it is difficult to understand how that phenomenon is seen as a defined spot in
the sky, which means the glow of a star is not radiated light but perception of
the glow produced by the processes that release photons. (There is a logical
explanation.)
Conclusion: The evidence presented to
justify the theories related to the big bang are defective. The theory and
justification are accepted by the scientific community because their interest
is not to establish the truth but to establish a concept conceived so that the
source of the energy and processes involved in creation can be ignored.
Follow on: The concept of elementary
energy particles advanced by Fundamental Physics as posted at milespelton26.blogspot.com
or www.facebook.com/fundamentalphysics, provides a logical explanation in
layman’s language for the processes of creation.
No comments:
Post a Comment