Logic vs Relativism
By: Miles Pelton,
March 2014
Equations
and mathematics do not substitute for logical reasoning. Consider:
·
When quantum particles of energy with absolute
behavior self-assemble to produce an assembly that exhibits physical presence but
the particles retain their behavior, there has been no conversion. Calling the
assembly mass or matter does not change the fact that it is an assembly of the
original energy particles that remain unchanged.
·
When such an assembly is disassembled releasing
the original unchanged energy particles, as occurs in combustion or fission for
example, there has been no conversion. The behavior, including energy
intensity, of the original energy particles remain unchanged.
The equation
E=Mc2 is purported to prove conversion of mass to energy however, it
merely shows the theorized relationship between the units of measure assigned
to the assembled state (Mass) and the assembled energy particles. Even if that
relationship is true it does not prove conversion took place. That equation is
further compromised by inclusion of the energy expended to produce acceleration
of an object as a part of the energy of the involved assembled particles. There
is no disputing that an object in motion carries the potential to do work through
force but force is not energy and certainly not energy involved in the assembly
of the object. It is not energy that would be released by “decay”,
disassociation, of the object. In fact, the work done by matter in motion
results in the disassociation (disassembly) upon collision, which can be as
relatively insignificant as molecules of gasses in the atmosphere, where upon;
it is the energy involved in the assembly of the involved objects that is
released, not the energy that caused the motion.
There are those who will argue that the scenario
outlined is not proven but the argument is presented to show that the
conservation concept is not proven to be valid. It is the conservation concept
that needs proving. Further, the conservation concept makes no allowance for
variation in energy behavior. That is tantamount to recognizing the behavior of
the energy involved is unchanged, which supports the argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment