Sunday, June 29, 2014
Saturday, June 28, 2014
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
Saturday, June 21, 2014
Thursday, June 19, 2014
Demonstrating
Affinity Energy
By: Miles Pelton,
6/2014
Abstract:
A theory has
been developed claiming the existence of a here to fore unrecognized form of
fundamental energy. The theory recognizes one form of fundamental energy that
produces attraction force and a second that produces a repelling force between
elementary particles and then claims evidence supports the existence of a third
form of energy that powers an affinity between the attraction and the repelling
energy charges. The challenge is to demonstrate proof that the affinity form of
energy exists. The accompanying photographs provides visual evidence that this
presentation explains.
Discussion:
The
fundamental force in physics and otherwise throughout the sciences, involves
the attraction of energy charges to produce binding of component, which forces
are recognized as involving opposing or positive and negative charges. In the
realm of electrical energy the power to produce electricity involves
establishing a “difference of potential” by creating a separation between
positive and negative, otherwise known as attraction and repelling, charges. In
other situations it is the attraction of a proton for an electron, where the
proton carries a charge produced by attraction energy charges and the electron
charge is produced by the repelling energy charge. What has never been
explained is what powers the “difference of potential” to produce the
attraction of electron charges across the “difference of potential.
The Van der
Graaff generator pictured (courtesy the Boston museum of science) generates a separation
of positive and negative charges that are attraction and repelling charges and
otherwise proton and electron charges. Electron charges are isolated and
deposited on the collector, a hollow metal sphere that is insulated from the
earth potential, the attraction or positive charges. The differential grows
with each electron charge added to the collector. The electron charge repels
other like charges and has no attraction power. The positive charge otherwise
known as protons also repel like charges yet somehow the proton charge is able
to attract the electron charge. There is no question that it exists but the
cause has never been explained and why are the electron charges not annihilated
by the attraction charges.
Each electron
is a single charge of the fundamental repelling energy. Protons are an assembly
of 1,836 elementary particles that are a composite assembly of attraction and
repelling charges plus as theorized a third affinity charge. It is the
repelling charges of the 1,836 contributing elementary particles that produces
the repelling force between protons while the attraction charges produces
attraction with other attraction charges. The question never asked: why the
attraction and repelling charges do not annihilate each other? The answer is
because they are not opposite charges but interact because of a third energy
charge that establishes an affinity between attraction and repelling charges,
which charge is exposed as the difference of potential created when attraction
and repelling, positive and negative, proton and electron charges are separated
as with the Van de Graaff generator..
When
electrons flow over or through matter they are forced to move from atom to
atom. It makes no difference if the movement is through an electrical
conductor, the air or flesh. Electrons move because they are forced to move. It
takes force to remove an electron from an atom and the process breaks atoms.
That is why, when electricity flows through flesh it causes damage. The work
done moving electrons from atom to atom in electricity is called resistance. In
chemistry and biology the movement of electrons changes the composition of
atoms and molecules. The movement of electrons changes atoms and molecules.
With static
charge as generated by a Van de Graaff generator electrons are not caused to
flow, rather the energy charge that powers the difference of potential is
exposed. It can be seen as causing the frizzy hair because the boy in this case
is included as an adjunct of the charge collector so that each length of hair
is charged with the same charge as the adjacent length of hair. The like charges
repel producing the fussy hair. No damage is done because electrons did not
flow. Similarly when of sufficient intensity, the charge can arc in the act of
discharging the difference of potential but electrons are not moved. The “spark”
seen is the affinity energy charge that when concentrations are exposed the
concentration is visible as a glow. (That phenomena was demonstrated by http://milespelton26.blogspot.com/2014/05/explaining-light-illumination-and-vision.html
.)
Conclusion:
This
explanation is offered as evidence that a here to fore unrecognized charge of fundamental
energy that establishes an affinity between the fundamental attraction and
repelling charges exists and is the energy that powers the “difference of
potential” in electric, chemical and biological phenomena..
Wednesday, June 18, 2014
Positive and Negative Charges, the Rest of the Story
Positive and Negative
Charges, the Rest of the Story
By: Miles Pelton,
6/2014
Electricity
is one of the first physics phenomenon studied. As early as 600 BC
demonstrations were being conducted showing what subsequently became known as
static electricity was created by rubbing fur with a piece of amber. The
demonstrations showed a force of attraction between charged particles and the
discharge of a visible spark. That is the way things stood for 2,000 years.
In the
1,600’s AD researchers concluded that the rubbing action transferred electron energy
charges from the fur to the amber to create a “difference of potential”. That
is, a place with an excess and a place with a deficit of charges. The
breakthrough came when it was realized electron charges flowed through a
conductor connecting two “difference of potential” points to equalize the
“difference of potential”. From then until now it is accepted without further
consideration that the “difference of potential” is the cause of electricity
and the two points of differential were called positive and negative. (Positive
being the point with an excess of electron charges and negative the point with
a deficit.)
That theory
has been accepted without question for all these years even though there is no
explanation for how it works or what gives the “differencel of potential” the
power to drive electrons through a return circuit that can produce work in the process.
That is one of the physics theories that caused me great concern personally
through 60 plus years engaged in radio and electric power generation. Concern
that prompted these 20 plus years of research to find an explanation.
Difference
of potential is analogous to the apple falling from the tree that allegedly
opened Newton’s mind. With gravity, the “difference of potential” is created
when an object exists or is elevated to a higher elevation, such as water in a
dam or above a water fall. Then, the force of gravity that pulls the water, and
the apple, to a lower elevation is used to do work. But even that proven
concept has been discarded by modern physicists who have been inventing other
convoluted explanations for gravity such as warping space-time and the equivalence
principle that equates gravity and acceleration as the same. That distortion of
truth may also be caused by failure of science to recognize their beliefs
regarding “difference of potential” is wrong.
For many this
may seem like a “so what” situation since many believe that what will be will
be regardless of what scientists believe. That is true, but in the meantime
great harm is being done. The ramifications are analogous to slavery and ethnic
and racial discrimination that was accepted for centuries until the general
population came to realize the great harm being done. It is indifference for
the fundamentals of physics that we and our children are not only not being taught
the truths needed to live but give science carte blanch freedom and the
classrooms of our schools to ridicule religious beliefs. That is counterproductive
to a healthy society. Further, with the aid of institutions of higher learning
and civil government, huge amounts of talent and fortune are expended or
misdirected research and study of things of questionable value and events where
nothing can be done to change what goes on. Meanwhile, our children are being
force fed defective information and our world suffers from our lack of
consideration in areas that are within our power to correct.
The answer to
what powers difference of potential is affinity energy, a here-to-fore
unrecognized form of fundamental energy that along with attraction and
repelling energy, forms into composite elementary particles of which all things
are made.
There is
little chance these words will gain the attention of the community of
scientists but if each person took an interest in denouncing the run amok
program of modern physics their attention might be won as it was with civil
rights. Support for this and similar revelations posted at milespelton.blogspot.com
and https://plus.google.com/u/0/113381801610599831022/posts would be a good way
to start.
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Positive and Negative Electrical Charges
Positive and Negative
Electrical Charges
By: Miles Pelton, 6/2014
Abstract:
The concept
of positive and negative electric charges developed from demonstrations by
Thales of Miletus about 600 BC by rubbing fur with amber. The term electric was
invented by William Gilbert about 1600 AD. Throughout the years the terms have
been demonstrated but the cause has never been proven. The behavior of electric
charges has been accepted as an invariant constant in Physics, a fundamental
characteristic of matter.
There have
been a myriad of explanations and demonstrations of the behavior of electrical
charges over the years. In fact the field of electricity has grown from those demonstrations
and study of behavior. There has been some effort to explain the cause but in
the end electric charge has been accepted as a fundamental characteristic of
matter where the charge remains constant, which is the basic law of physics
otherwise known as the conservation of energy. (To be believed through faith,
i.e: without proof.)
Discussion:
The
interaction of energy to form matter is what physics and creation is all about,
especially for those who believe that creation has been a progressive evolving
development, in which case what exists developed from a fundamental thing. Most
are in agreement that the fundamental thing was a form of energy. Therefore, if
the power to do something is inherent in or is a fundamental constant of
something, then it evolved or was developed from the originating fundamental
energy. The task then is to follow the bouncing ball, to put the horse before
the cart.
Without
magic particles of energy capable of producing one force, say attraction, is
not going to produce anything except a ball of attraction energy particles
existing at a point. So, it would appear a second forms of fundamental energy
particles able to repel the constriction of the attracting force is required in
order to create an assembly with physical presence
But how is that going to work, the attraction
and repelling energy particles, analogous with positive and negative charges,
will mutually annihilate. Without some mystical intervention a big
insurmountable problem. Except: If the attraction charges attracted only like
attraction charges and repelling charges repelled only like repelling charges,
and one of each where made a composite particle then the charges would not mutually
annihilate. But now more problems.
Particles
each with an attraction and a repelling charge will only produce two particle
assemblies; and how can an attraction and a repelling charge be made to assemble
into a composite assembly; and how will the attraction and repelling charges
interact to produce a positive-negative relationship without magic? All of
those problems vanish opening the door to self-induced progressive evolution of
the creation process, with the introduction of a third form of fundamental
energy charge. A charge that causes the attraction charges to attract repelling
charges, a charge that creates positive and negative potentials, an affinity
charge.
With three
fundamental energy charges coexisting as a composite particle it could be
elementary to the progressive self-development of all things seen and unseen.
Being a composite of three complimentary charges the particle presents no
detectable charge in the manner employed in explaining the quantum chromo dynamics
involved in the formation of quarks.
Conclusion:
While the behavior of electrical charges has
been thoroughly researched and explained the cause has never been established
and proven. Reliance on the conservation of energy law is not a proven
explanation. The introduction of the concept of a composite three part
elementary particle of fundamental energy charges provides a clear explanation
of the cause and the processes involved in the progression of the creation of
matter including the phenomena associated with electrical charges.
Monday, June 16, 2014
Quarks Revisited
Quarks Revisited
By: Miles Pelton,
6/2014
Abstract:
The current
explanation of quarks is fraught with questionable claims, theories and
non-explanation explanations. Most of the claims are based upon interpretation
of observations of reactions produced in particle accelerators or beliefs
derived by unproven theories. Clearly the current explanation has discounted
the concept of elementary particles as recognized by Galileo and Newton.
Discussion:
Paramount
is the acceptance of quarks as particles elementary to the formation of matter.
By admission a real quark has never been observed as existing except for
fleeting microseconds following release in particle accelerators when their
presence is marked as a trail shown in a “cloud chamber”. By admission quarks are
not stable and change quantitative values spontaneously. Further, other than
their existence in conjunction with the formation of neutrons and protons there
is no evidence they fulfill an elementary function. As described quarks are not
likely material with which to build the universe.
Theories
intended to explain the behavior of quarks rely upon unproven conjecture most
notably the theory of quantum chromo dynamics. The concept used in an attempt to
explain quark behavior can be explained equally well if not better based upon the
assembly of elementary particles made of three forms of absolute behavior
fundamental energy charges. One charge attracts a like attraction charge only;
a second charge repels a like repelling charge only; a third establishes an
affinity between the charges that attract and the charges that repel with a
quantum intensity of each in each elementary particle
In the context of a composite particle the
three charges present a zero charge but each has a very specific task, which is
to self-assemble in this instance to form quarks. Following the fundamental
physics law of force inversely proportional to the distance squared, 960
elemental particles assemble to make a quark eventually to be united with two
other such assemblies. As the three quarks assemble the assembly develops both
a center of gravity and a singularity center when the 960 attraction charges constrict
into a point charge. The force exerted on constricting the individual quarks as
well as their assembly increases as the distances involved are reduced. First
one quark develops a singularity center changing the nature of that quark. Then
called an up quark and the assembly a neutron. Quarks without a singularity are
down quarks. Eventually without interference a second quark develops a
singularity center giving the assembly a powerful singularity center and the
assembly with two up and one down quarks transforms into a proton.
In
transforming the proton emits an electron charge. It is unclear but is
theorized the third quark develops a singularity center at that time. In which
case, the proton has acquired three 960 unit singularity centers plus a
powerful singularity center of 1,836 units of attraction charge that is encased
by the 1,836 repelling energy charges. It is worthy to note that attraction
charges produce gravitational force which is the equivalent of rest mass
therefore, the quarks and the proton assembly present a mass considerably
greater than 1,836 standalone elementary particles. This agrees with the position
that it is the attraction charge that powers gravity.
It should
be noted that the up quark in a neutron has developed a singularity center but
since it interacts with a like charge only, that singularity center, which is
an attraction charge does not register as giving the neutron a charge. However,
the neutron up quark plays a role in the assembly of nuclei since it interacts
with the singularity centers of the proton’s up quarks. It is the energy of the
bonds formed between quarks and between the singularity centers of protons that
is released in nuclear reactions. Assemblies of protons as in atom nuclei,
produces a singularity center for each level of assembly. Therefore, the
singularity center of a uranium atom is considerably more powerful (intense)
than is the singularity center of a hydrogen atom. At the singularity point the
intensity equals the number up protons in the assembly.
When viewed
from this perspective there is every reason to believe that quarks are only
formations of elementary particles that exist only as long as the neutron or
proton remain intact. Failure of even one quark bond results in the
disassociation of the assembly. They certainly do not qualify as elementary
particles
Conclusion:
The
community of Physicists need to seriously rethink their approach to the study
of Physics. Fundamental Physics is not a religious concept.
Sunday, June 15, 2014
Nuclear Energy
Revisiting Nuclear
Energy
By: Miles Pelton,
6/2014
The big
mystery in nuclear energy is how nuclei assemble into such a powerful bundle of
energy when the principle component, protons, strongly repel each other and
neutrons seemingly have no attraction power.
Set the
stage: Each proton and each neutron has a center of gravity of 1,836 units that
attract each-others 1,836 elementary particles. Their power increases
exponentially as distance decreases and their assembly develops a center of
gravity where the intensity is the sum of the joined centers of gravity. In
addition, the elementary particles assemble to create quarks. A neutron has one
up and two down quarks and each proton has two up and one down quark. The up
quarks have developed a singularity center meaning the attraction charges have
constricted into a point charge, a center of attraction charges. Simultaneously
the repelling charges are left out but remain attached to their singularity
center by affinity energy charges there by creating a periphery encasement of repelling
charges that strongly repel like charges. The singularity centers each produces
lines of binding force that bind with other singularity centers. That action is
opposed by the repelling charges that surround each singularity center. Protons
that develop a 2 X 1,836 singularity center present a powerful repelling force
whereas, the magnitude of repelling charge of the neutrons has not increased.
Act 1:
Standing alone, protons and neutrons do not form a strong assembly however, two
protons and two neutrons form a strongly bound assembly as a consequence of
their interaction that is principally controlled by the behavior of the attraction
energy centers. The neutrons help create a more powerful center of gravity (4 X
1,836) that helps to counter the repelling forces thereby reducing intervening
distance while increasing exponentially the power of attraction. Meanwhile the
binding power of the singularity centers increases with reduced intervening
distance. Eventually the attraction power of the singularity center overcomes
the repelling force existing between protons and the singularity centers of the
two assembled protons generates a more powerful singularity center. It is the
power of the singularity center of the assembly in conjunction with the absence
of distance that establishes the power of bonds formed. It is the power of the
bonds formed by singularity centers that is released in nuclear reactions.
Gravity bonds do not fragment as do singularity center bonds so are not involved
in nuclear reactions.
It is the
role of affinity energy charges to bond repelling charges to attraction energy
that forms singularities without which there could be no nuclei assembly
limiting creation to the formation of hydrogen atoms. Affinity energy also
contributes to the energy released by nuclear reactions since the bonds they
form are fragmented by such reactions. Further, being the energy form that
produces illumination, the affinity energy released contributes to the
intensity of the light release that accompanies nuclear reactions. Further;
since power of attraction energy is reduced by increased temperature, it is
reasoned that the formation of atoms takes place at near absolute zero degrees,
not at the high heat generated by a “big bang”.
Conclusion: Affinity energy plays a vital role in the
forming of atoms and in removing the mystery of how atomic nuclei assemble.
Please note that it is the energy that formed the bonds that held the nuclei
together that is released when those bonds fragment, IT IS NOT the conversion
of mass to energy unless that action defines the expression. Matter is
disassembled, not transformed. Therefore, some brilliant mind needs to explain
where the energy released comes from.
.
Saturday, June 14, 2014
Friday, June 13, 2014
Proof of a Supplier of the Energy of Cfreation
Proof of a Supplier
of the Energy of Creation
By: Miles Pelton,
June 2014
Abstract:
Great
effort has been expended over the years of scientific research not only trying
to prove the energy that powers creation is not supplied from a source outside
the universe system but to conceal evidence otherwise. Argument is presented
that proves energy is continuously supplied to create and sustain creation.
This argument
is based upon defining creation as: bringing something into existence with the means
left without definition.
Discussion:
The inverse
distance squared law is a physical constant in physics when dealing with
radiated energy. That law is found in Newton’s law of universal gravitation, as
well as laws dealing with light and electromagnetic radiation. While not
recognized as such by documented physics principles, the energy that powers gravity,
light and electromagnetics are the three forms of energy fundamental to all
creation. These three forms of energy assembled as elementary particles are
fundamental to the creation of matter and all subsequent forms of energy.
There is an
explanation for the inverse distance squared law. Simply, energy radiated from
a point into three dimensional space disperses with distance from the point of
origin. Think of a point expanding spherically into an unbounded three
dimensional space. Now, recognize that something is left out of the inverse
distance squared law. The energy will disperse at a constant diminishing
intensity only if the intensity (pressure) in the point source is maintained
constant. Therein lies the proof that the energy fundamental to creation and
the sustenance of creation, the energy inherent in elementary energy particles,
has a means of sustaining intensity.
Conclusion:
The
argument proves itself, the intensity of the energy supplied from a point
source is maintained constant requiring a means to maintain the intensity of
the point source.
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
Explaining Auroras Borealis and Australis
Explaining Auroras
Borealis and Australis (updated)
By: Miles Pelton,
June 2014
Abstract
Current
explanation of the auroras is all theory that leaves many questions and provides
few answers that pass the common sense stage. Basic conclusions, such as their
relationship with the earth’s magnetic force field and solar wind, are well
founded. It is the mechanics involved in explaining how those phenomena
interact to produce the unique auroras that lacks clarity. With recognition of
a here-to-fore unrecognized type of fundamental energy as the cause of
illumination, the mechanics involved in auroras is clarified. Since the
referenced energy acts to cause the energy that causes attraction (gravity
charge or by some gravitons) and the energy that causes repelling (electron
charge) to have a liking for each other, it is called an affinity charge
Discussion:
Solar wind
is primarily protons that because of being overheated, have lost their power to
attract. The energy that drives protons is the attracting (gravity) charge
therefore protons have lost the power to bond affinity charges and in turn
electron charges. The dead protons are ejected from the sun as solar wind.
Meanwhile, recognize that affinity charges (light) released as a consequence of
the fission reactions taking place on the sun, are radiating through the same
space as the solar wind but the affinity charges do not interact with the dead
photons.
The lines
of magnetic force of the earth’s magnetic force field are encased with repelling
(electron) charges. It is the repelling charges that cause lines of magnetic force
to repel other lines of magnetic force, which is a fundamental force of
magnetism. Then recall that affinity charge interact with, are attracted to,
repelling charges. Normally the magnitude of affinity charges attracted to the
magnetic lines of force are not sufficient to be visible. However, at times of
high solar flare activity the number of affinity charges radiated by the sun
increases. During those periods the number of affinity charges attracted to the
lines of magnetic force are sufficient to be visible during hours of darkness
as the glow called auroras. Because the affinity charges are attached to the
lines of magnetic force they expose the behavior of the magnetic line of force.
The different
colors displayed are the consequence of the behavior of illumination. Color is
produced by the perception of illuminating energy, which as now claimed to be
affinity charges. It is the strength of the bonds of the atoms illuminated that
establishes color and since the structure of the various atoms is unique the
energy intensity forming those bonds is likewise unique. The intensity (think
strength) of bonding energy is reflected in the frequency or wave length of the
energy. Our sight senses interpret bonding energy intensity frequency as color
with each frequency (wave length) perceived as a specific color. Lower
frequencies are seen as red and the colors progress through orange, yellow,
green, blue and violet as the frequencies increase.
When affinity charges bond to an object, in
this case the lines of magnetic force, they reflect the energy intensity of the
bonds of the illuminated object. The bond intensity of the lines of magnetic
force decrease with altitude therefore the aurora color at high altitude may be
red or shades of red whereas, at lower altitudes the intensity is stronger and
the colors reflected are in the green range.
Conclusion:
This
explanation is offered not only to clarify the mechanics involved in auroras
but to justify the conclusion that the concept of affinity energy demands
recognition.
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
Monday, June 9, 2014
What Drives Electromagnetic Radiation
What Drives
Electromagnetic Radiation
By: Miles Pelton,
June 2014
Abstract:
The subject
of electromagnetic radiation is the most confused misunderstood and poorly
explained area in all of physics Most of what is understood developed through progressive
trial and error application of technological processes. Theories are rife with
non-explanation explanations often offered to explain other non-explanation
explanations. Glaring mistaken theories are hidden by torturous non-explanation
explanations. Understanding comes from realizing that the development of the
matter and forces involved in electromagnetism are the product of elementary
particles that are composite assemblies of the three forms of fundamental energy
namely; attraction charges that attract only like attraction charges; repelling
charges that repel only like repelling charges; affinity charges that cause
attraction and repelling charges to attract each other. That will be demonstrated
by this explanation.
Discussion:
It is the
intent to explain the concepts resulting from the application of fundamental
physics concepts rather than argue existing misdirected theories. All forces
are derived from the three fundamental energy charges previously stated with
each existing in elementary particles at the quantum intensity of one unit. The
attraction charge that attracts only like attraction charges is contracted into
a singularity point that becomes the heart of protons and is the charge that
produces gravitational force. The repelling charge that repels only like
repelling charges forms an encasing shell around the proton singularity and is
held in place by the affinity charge. The repelling charge is what current
theory calls an electron charge. The affinity charge establishes the
interaction between the proton singularity and the electron charge. The
attraction charge becomes the ground reference for the difference of potential
created by the affinity charge.
Current
theory calls the affinity effect by the term “a difference of potential”. The
affinity charge is the power that drives the proton-electron force including
driving electricity and the force involved in valence bonds. The repelling
charge is always held by affinity charges as the periphery layer of elementary
particles, photons and lines of magnetic force. It is caused to spiral in the
process of emission by protons where the spiraling periphery covering of lines
of magnetic force and photons imparts a repelling component to those
phenomenon.
For
clarification purposes, the relationship between protons and electrons is not
in response to their opposite charges but because of the affinity charge. It is
the spiraling repelling charge that impart the magnetic component to flowing
electrons and lines of magnetic force. It is the spiraling repelling component that
is transposed from the lines of magnetic force to the windings in electric
power generators along with the affinity charge that establishes the “difference
of potential”. When a return path is provided the difference of potential moves
in an effort to equalize the difference of potential. But the affinity charges
have established a bond with the repelling (electron) charges so they are drawn
along. As a consequence the resultant current flow has two components. One the spiraling
repelling charge plus the affinity charge. Each spiralling repelling (electron)
charge carries its spiraling energy field that is the component known as
producing magnetic force and is accompanied by an affinity charge of equal
intensity (wavelength). That clarifies the duality theory of electromagnetic
charges. There is in fact two linked charges involved in electric phenomena.
The
electromagnetic radiation involved in radio, television, radar type
transmissions are produced by setting up an electric field that imparts a
counter electric field on a distant receiver configuration. Electrons are not
transmitted, only the field intensity is impressed across the intervening
distance.
Radiation
involving the transmission of photons is an entirely different phenomena than
electromagnetic radiation as is x-ray radiation. They have been covered by a separate
discussion.
Conclusion:
The ambiguities and misunderstanding associated
with electricity, electromagnetic radiation and the duality of electromagnetic
forces are clarified by applying the fundamental physics concept of tri-charge
elementary particles.
What Drives Radiation
What Drives Radiation
By; Miles Pelton,
June 2014
Abstract:
Science has
ask us to accept that radiation just happens with no cause. Nothing with the
precise behavior of radiation will just happen, there must be a cause. That is
the objective of this paper, to identify and explain the power behind radiation.
Discussion:
Radiation
involves photons (electromagnetic radiation is a separate subject) that exist
in a wide range of intensity but in all cases are composite assemblies of the
trio of fundamental energy intrinsic in elementary particles. In fact, elementary
particles correspond to the quantum photon. Photons are produced by protons
where assemblies of protons, as in an atom nucleus, develop photons whose
intensity is in proportion to the number of assembled protons. Protons emit photons
in the form of lines of force where the attraction charge intensity of the
photons powers the binding force of the line of force emitted. When lines of
force are severed the photons of which made are freed and radiate from that
point. The question then becomes, what causes the photons to radiate.
Photon
radiation involves very precise controlled behavior including speed. The force
applied to move photons diminishes in strength as the distance from the point
of rupture, squared. The constant decrease in force translates to a speed rate
that sustains photon acceleration at a constant speed designated as the “speed
of light”. That behavior gives indication that the energy inherent within the
photon itself that diminishes in strength with distance is at least a factor in
powering radiation. Photon radiation is limited to the system from which
released. Photons released from massive
systems like stars and galaxies that involve high energy intensities can
involve great distances. Bear in mind that some lines of force are associated
with the universe so radiation from those lines of force may extend to the
limits of the universe.
Lines of
force that bind components into matter are the product of protons and
assemblies of protons (atoms) that generate a center of proton power in a
manner similar to the manner by which assemblies of matter generate a center of
gravity. While lines of force are customarily seen to involve atoms there is
every reason assemblies of atoms, say a planet or a star, also develop a center
of proton power. However, such bonds are not known to fail although could be
associated with colliding or dying stars and galaxies and could account for the
more powerful radiation associated with those events.
So the
power behind radiation is a product of the proton center of power and is system
specific. The core of proton power is the singularity formed of concentrated attraction
energy. However, the intensity of the charge of a singularity center is matched
with equal intensity repelling charge and affinity charge. Repelling charges
repel like repelling charges, attraction charges attract like attraction
charges and affinity charges establish attraction between attraction and
repelling charges. So the question then, what charge does a photon freed from a
line of force display?
Photons are
a composite of the three fundamental charges, HOWEVER; it is the bond produced
by the attraction charge that is fractured releasing photons. The attraction
charge of the released photon has been distanced from the system proton center
of power. Its power to attract has been expended. It can be attracted but it
cannot attract. The photon of which a part is no longer neutral. It exhibits a
repelling charge and in that state repelled by the repelling charge of the
center of proton power. Recall that fundamental energy charges set up an energy
field that diminishes in intensity as the square of the distance, which
diminishing strength field accelerates like charges at the speed of light. (“Speed
of light” is an adverbial phrase defining speed it does not confer that the
object of concern is light.)
(While not
pertinent to radiation, it is worthy to note that the expended attraction
charge carried by a photon explains why the charges deposited from impacting
photons produces the effect called heat.)
Conclusion:
It is the
intensity of the repelling charge component of a center of proton power that
powers the radiation of photons. Yes scientists, there is a cause.
Identifying a Here-to-fore Unidentified
Identifying a
Here-to-fore Unidentified Fundamental Energy Form
By: Miles Pelton,
June, 2014
Abstract:
There are a
number of forces in fundamental physics that have been accepted without the
cause specifically identified. These instances are seen as the cause of
illumination and vision; the cause for the “difference of potential” that is
involved in electrical energy; the cause for the binding of electrons in
chemical and atomic reactions; a cause to explain how attracting and repelling
forces work together to form matter. Consideration of those phenomena leads to recognition
that there is a here-to-fore unrecognized fundamental energy form that is in
addition to the energy that produces attraction and the energy that produces
repelling forces.
Discussion:
In order to
explain the phenomena involved with fundamental physics the cause must be
understood. To say that energy particles are bound together to form matter does
not explain what is bound or how binding is achieved. To explain what light or
vision or gravity does is not an explanation of the cause of that behavior. To
pass off electricity as caused by a difference of potential does not explain what
gives a difference of potential the power to produce electricity nor does it
explain what makes electrons do what they do. Those phenomena are now being
explained by non-explanation explanations.
It is
generally acknowledged that fundamental energy acts from a point to establish
an energy field that diminishes in intensity as the radial distance increases
from that point. That is the behavior evident with the fundamental forms of
energy that powers gravity, illumination and radiation. That characteristic
must be present to qualify as fundamental energy.
It is also
generally recognized that particles of energy with the power to cause
attraction by other like particles powers the attraction force seen in the
assembly of particles of energy to form quarks, neutrons and protons and that
the energy that powers that behavior comes in packets or particles of discrete
quantum intensity. That behavior leads to the generally accepted conclusion
that the agent responsible for powering that behavior is inherent in the
particles that are assembled to make quarks, neutrons and protons. Those
characteristics define the energy particles fundamental to the formation of
matter. They have been derived through studying the recorded observations of a
variety of demonstrations conducted over years of scientific research but are
never the less conclusions.
It is also
generally recognized that a repelling force is involved in the assembly of elementary
particles to form quarks, neutrons and protons. It is recognized that without a
repelling force the attraction energy would contract into a point without establishing
a physical presence. In order to create an assembly with physical presence,
there is need for an energy component to produce repelling force and that it
exist inherent in the particles that are assembled to make quarks, neutrons and
protons in other words an elementary particle.
There lies
a problem that prevents the development of understanding regarding how matter
is created from energy. In order for elementary energy particles to
self-assemble each elementary particle must have an intrinsic attraction charge
and an opposing repelling charge but there is no known way to obtain that
behavior with a single energy charge. That means each elementary particle must
contain both an attraction and a repelling charge but if these were opposing
energy charges they would annihilate rather than coexist inherent in an
elementary particle. Obviously a third component is needed to prevent
annihilation. Now a new problem. If the attraction charge in one particle attracted
the repelling charge in a second particle and the same reaction by the charges
in the second particle, there would never be anything except two particle
assemblies.
Since
self-assembly of elementary particles has produced quarks, neutrons and
protons, there is a way. Consider the following: If attraction charges attract
only like attraction charges and repelling charges repel only like repelling
charges they could coexist without annihilation and they could produce “chain
reaction” assembly but without help they would not assemble to form an
elementary particle. However, with a third form of energy that produces an
affinity between attraction charges and repelling charges they could assembly
into a common elementary particle and each charge would constitute a quantum
particle of their respective charge type and the three quanta would be an
inherent component of each elementary particle.
The trio of
charges forming each elementary particle present a zero charge effect making
detection of elementary particles difficult. A means to detect “electric
charge” has been developed however; the “electric charge” in this instance is
the “difference of potential” between attraction and repelling charges, which
is the here-to-fore unrecognized affinity charge. It is not the electric
charge. The electric charge is the repelling charge. The repelling charge can
be identified as the cause of the repelling force produced by magnetic forces.
Each of the
three fundamental energy charges produces a variety of effects in addition to
their basic job. The attraction energy charge also is: the fundamental unit of
mass; the singularity center of protons and assemblies of protons (nuclei); and
the producer of the effect called heat;
The
repelling energy charge also is: what is currently called an electron charge:
producer of the repelling component of magnetic force: producer of the weak
force in atomic nuclei.
The
affinity energy charge also: produces illumination and vision: it is the
difference of potential that powers electricity and the binding force for
proton-electron interactions. It is the keystone of creation.
Conclusion:
With
recognition that a third form of fundamental energy, here to fore unrecognized,
exists and along with attraction and repelling energy forms elementary particles,
the process of creating matter with a physical presence from energy is readily
explained and understood and with that, all fundamental physics principles.
Friday, June 6, 2014
Thursday, June 5, 2014
Wednesday, June 4, 2014
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Monday, June 2, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)